The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for partition of ancestral land (approximately Ac.2-17 guntas in Puppalguda village, Ranga Reddy District) against the respondents (defendants), claiming that defendant Nos. 4, 5, and 10 had sold a portion of the joint family property to defendant Nos. 11 and 12 via a registered sale deed dated 30.11.2002 without the plaintiffs' consent and without paying consideration to certain co-sharers. The Trial Court (XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, L.B. Nagar) rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, holding the suit was barred by limitation under Article 109 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The appellants challenged this rejection before the Telangana High Court, arguing that limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence and cannot be decided summarily at the threshold, especially when the plaint specifically pleads the date of knowledge (September 2022) as the starting point of limitation. The High Court considered whether the Trial Court's order suffered from perversity or illegality warranting interference.