The petitioner, D. Tirupathi, claimed he worked as contract labour with TGNPDCL from January 1994 to March 1999 and was entitled to appointment as LDC/Typist under B.P.Ms. No. 36 dated 18.05.1997. Despite multiple rounds of litigation and repeated directions from the Telangana High Court to consider his candidature, the respondents rejected his claim on successive grounds including alleged non-genuine service certificates, a 'chit agreement' basis for work, and the subsequent withdrawal of B.P.Ms. No. 36 on 30.08.2006. The petitioner challenged the impugned rejection proceedings dated 30.11.2015, arguing they were arbitrary, violated principles of natural justice, and amounted to non-compliance with binding judicial directions. He invoked Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution, also alleging discriminatory treatment compared to similarly situated persons appointed in CPDCL in 2011. The judgment text as provided ends before the court's final ruling is recorded.