The appellant, M/s. Ajaykumar Sushilkumar, filed a commercial suit before the Additional Special Court (Commercial Disputes) at Hyderabad seeking recovery of approximately Rs. 4.75 crore for supply of gunny bags and PP woven sacks to respondent No. 1, a Co-operative Sugar Factory in Maharashtra, over several years. The respondents sought return of the plaint on two grounds: that the dispute fell exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Co-operative Court under Sections 91 and 163 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and that a jurisdiction clause in the purchase orders confined disputes to courts at Pandharpur Taluka, Solapur District, Maharashtra. The Trial Court allowed the return of plaint, holding that the Commercial Court lacked both territorial and subject-matter jurisdiction. The Telangana High Court, on appeal, examined the scope of an enquiry under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, emphasising that at this stage the court must confine itself to the plaint averments and assume them to be true, and noted that the plaint disclosed a simple commercial transaction for recovery of unpaid sale consideration with no dispute touching the internal affairs of the Society. The judgment text as provided ends mid-analysis, so the final outcome of the appeal is not fully captured in the supplied text.