The petitioners (Rohtash and others) filed a review application before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking review/recall of a judgment dated 23.12.2025 passed in CWP No.31045 of 2025 against Punjab State Power Corporation Limited. They contended that the respondent-Corporation had acted contrary to notifications dated 14.10.2019 and 21.10.2019, and that unfilled posts in the ESM and Sportsperson categories should have led to operation of the waiting list in their favour. The Court examined the settled legal principles governing review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, relying on Supreme Court precedents including Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati (2013) and State of Telangana v. Mohd. Abdul Qasim (2024 INSC 310), which restrict review to discovery of new evidence, error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reason. The Court noted that the grounds raised by the petitioners were neither pleaded in the original writ petition nor raised in any timely representation, and that the new material did not meet the strict threshold required for review. Ancillary applications for condonation of 13 days' delay in filing the review and for placing additional documents on record were allowed, but the judgment does not record a final disposal of the main review application as the text is incomplete.