This case arises from a builder's agreement dated 17.09.1987 between Vanbey Holdings Pvt Ltd (appellant/decree holder) and respondents for purchase of commercial space, which led to a consent compromise decree in C.S.No.1338 of 1992 dated 13.09.1993 after the respondents sought to declare the agreement null and void. The decree provided for completion of construction at enhanced rates, failing which the amounts paid were to be refunded with interest, and on further failure, the decree was to be executed as a money decree, with a charge on the schedule property also recognised under the decretal terms and under Section 55(6) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Since the respondents failed to comply, the appellant filed Execution Petition No.194 of 2004, and attachment and prohibitory orders were passed in 2005 over approximately 21 grounds of property. The judgment debtors repeatedly obstructed auction sale proceedings through applications, appeals, third-party intervenors, suppression of facts, fabrication of documents, and collusion before multiple forums including the NCLT and an arbitral tribunal. The Division Bench of the Madras High Court is hearing these Original Side Appeals against the common order dated 26.05.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in Application Nos.6897 and 6898 of 2018 in the execution proceedings.