The State of Madhya Pradesh filed a Review Petition (RP No. 1171/2026) before the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Gwalior, seeking review of an order dated 04.09.2025 passed in W.P. No. 1028/2014, which had directed the State to treat Jagpal Singh Rajawat as eligible and consider him for appointment to the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-2. The State argued that Rajawat's case was wrongly equated with that of Neetu Dubey, a more meritorious candidate, while Rajawat contended that the original order merely directed consideration of his case based on merit and that both candidates had participated in the same 2011 selection process. The Court examined the scope of review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, relying on Supreme Court precedents including Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati (2013) 8 SCC 320 and State of West Bengal v. Kamal Sengupta (2008) 8 SCC 612, which hold that review lies only for a patent error apparent on the face of the record, discovery of new evidence, or any other sufficient reason. The Court found that the original order only directed consideration of Rajawat's case in accordance with his merit position and did not mandate his appointment, and that no error apparent on the face of the record existed to warrant review. Accordingly, the review petition was dismissed.