The petitioner, Moshers, filed an application before the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore under Sections 44 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 26/08/2022 passed by sole Arbitrator J. Hawkins in GAFTA Arbitration Case No. 18-634. By an earlier order dated 08/05/2026, the Court had already held the award to be enforceable and deemed it a decree of the High Court under Section 49 of the Act. The respondent, Shri Mittal Agritech Pvt. Ltd., raised an objection that since the High Court lacks ordinary original civil jurisdiction and has no Nazarat Department for execution, the decree should be transferred to a subordinate District Court or Commercial Court for execution under Sections 38 and 39 of the CPC. The petitioner countered that Supreme Court precedents in Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd., LMJ International Limited v. Sleepwell Industries Company Limited, and Government of India v. Vedanta Ltd. make it clear that enforcement and execution are composite proceedings before the same Court, and that under Section 49 read with Section 2(1)(e)(ii) of the Act, the 'Court' for international commercial arbitration is the High Court itself. The present order records these rival contentions and the legal framework governing execution of the foreign award as a deemed decree of the High Court.