Two appellants, Adnan Bashir Bangroo and Mohd. Manan Dar, challenged the order dated 12.07.2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge (Designated Special Court under the NIA Act), Srinagar, which framed charges against them under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Section 506 IPC in connection with alleged activities supporting the banned terrorist organisation The Resistance Front (TRF). The appellants were arrested on 19.03.2024 at a police checkpoint at Jehangir Chowk, Srinagar, where TRF posters and ₹1,00,000 in cash were recovered from them. They contended that the charges under Sections 13, 18, and 39 of the UAPA were unsustainable as the trial court had solely relied on confessional statements made before an Executive Magistrate without corroborative evidence, and that disclosure statements were inadmissible since no recovery was effected pursuant to them. The prosecution, however, relied on technical evidence including IPDR/GPRS data placing both appellants at the same location on 14.03.2024, FSL analysis of mobile phones revealing contact with virtual numbers and a photograph of a TRF terrorist, and financial investigation showing no legitimate source for the recovered cash. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar heard the appeals together as they arose from the same impugned order and involved common questions of fact and law, but the judgment text as provided does not disclose the final operative decision.