Tinku Alias Rinku vs State Of HpThe petitioner, Tinku alias Rinku, filed a petition before the Himachal Pradesh High Court seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No. 44 of 2026 registered at Police Station Patlikuhal, District Kullu, for an offence under Section 21 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that 52 grams of heroin was recovered from the petitioner's rented room following a search based on secret information. The petitioner contended that the recovered quantity was 'intermediate' and therefore the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply, and that he had not been convicted in earlier FIRs. The State opposed bail, citing the petitioner's extensive criminal antecedents including multiple pending FIRs under the NDPS Act and IPC, and arguing that the quantity recovered indicated commercial intent. The court considered the parameters for granting bail as laid down by the Supreme Court in Pinki v. State of U.P. (2025) 7 SCC 314 and other precedents, but the judgment text as provided does not record a final order.