The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of Sanjeev Kumar, who had been convicted by the Trial Court for causing the death of Madan Kumar in a road accident on 02.03.2004, when a truck driven by the accused struck a stationary motorcycle and dragged it approximately 50 feet. The Trial Court had convicted the accused under Sections 279 and 304A IPC and Sections 184 and 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding that he was driving under the influence of alcohol (126.5 mg% found in his blood) and was negligent. The Additional Sessions Judge (Appellate Court) set aside the conviction, holding that prosecution witnesses had no opportunity to observe the truck before the accident and their evidence was insufficient to prove the accused was driving. The High Court, while noting the limited scope of interference with acquittals (interference only if the view is impossible, perverse, wholly unsustainable, or manifestly illegal as per Sanjay Kumar v. State of Bihar, 2026 SCC OnLine SC 1373), proceeded to examine whether the Appellate Court's view met that threshold. The judgment text provided is incomplete and does not record the final decision of the High Court.