The petitioner Arshad Ali sought regular bail in connection with FIR No. 92 of 2026 registered at Police Station Majra, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, for an offence under Section 22 of the NDPS Act. He was found in possession of 90 capsules containing 54.056 grams of tramadol recovered from a tempo he was driving, and could not produce any documents authorising transportation of the capsules. The petitioner's counsel argued that the police had not drawn samples in accordance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act, which was fatal to the prosecution case, while the State opposed bail citing the large quantity recovered and the petitioner's criminal antecedents, including a prior FIR (No. 82 of 2023) under the same provision. The court considered the established legal parameters for granting bail as laid down by the Supreme Court in several precedents, including Pinki v. State of U.P. (2025) 7 SCC 314, and examined factors such as the nature of the charge, severity of punishment, criminal antecedents, and the prima facie case against the accused. The judgment text as provided does not record the final order, as it appears to be truncated before the court's ultimate decision.