The petitioner, Amritpal Singh, filed a petition before the Himachal Pradesh High Court seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No. 91 of 2026, registered at Police Station West, Boileauganj, Shimla, for offences under Sections 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that 14 grams of heroin was recovered from a car, and that the petitioner was identified as the main supplier of the heroin based on a disclosure statement by the co-accused, financial transactions (including a Google Pay transfer), and call detail records linking him to the co-accused. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the only material against him was the co-accused's statement and financial transactions, and that he was entitled to bail on the principle of parity since the co-accused had already been granted bail. The court considered the broad principles for grant of bail as laid down by the Supreme Court in Pinki v. State of U.P. (2025) 7 SCC 314 and several other precedents, examining factors such as the nature of the charge, severity of punishment, criminal antecedents, and likelihood of the accused committing further offences. The judgment text as provided does not record the final order, as it concludes mid-analysis.