Twelve petitioners (Amaninderjit Singh and others) filed pre-arrest bail petitions before the Himachal Pradesh High Court arising out of FIR No. 88 of 2026 registered at Police Station Majra, District Sirmour, for offences under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The petitioners claimed they were falsely implicated after a land dispute in which the informant party allegedly trespassed on their land, while the prosecution alleged that the petitioners abused the informant and his family members using casteist slurs, tore the clothes of women, and caused grievous injuries using weapons including a kirpan, iron rod, darat, and gandasi. The State and the informant opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the allegations, the risk of witness intimidation, and subsequent incidents including an alleged tractor burning (FIR No. 91 of 2026). The court considered the parameters for granting bail as laid down by the Supreme Court in Pinki v. State of U.P. (2025) 7 SCC 314 and other precedents, examining factors such as the nature of the charge, severity of punishment, and likelihood of witness tampering. The judgment text as provided does not record a final order, as it concludes mid-analysis.