The petitioners (original defendants) challenged an order dated 26.05.2026 passed by the Principal Civil Judge, Lodhika, in Execution Petition No. 4 of 2023, which had rejected their objections to the execution of a consent decree dated 13.04.2015. The consent decree arose from a suit for specific performance of a registered agreement to sell concerning certain land. Before the Gujarat High Court, the petitioners' sole contention was that the consent decree amounted to a decree granting a mandatory injunction and was therefore unenforceable after three years under Article 135 of the Limitation Act, 1963, making the execution petition time-barred. The High Court noted that this limitation argument had neither been pleaded in the petition nor raised before the Executing Court, and proceeded to examine whether the consent decree was truly a decree granting a mandatory injunction and whether the execution petition was barred by limitation. The judgment text provided ends before the court's final conclusion on these questions.