The appellant, Inam Singh @ Bhura, challenged his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of one Munshi Ram on the night of 26-27 October 2000 at Najafgarh, Delhi. The prosecution's case rested primarily on circumstantial evidence, including the 'last seen' theory, whereby witnesses PW-6/Jai Bhagwan and PW-12/Ram Kishan testified that they had left the appellant alone with the deceased and, upon returning, found the deceased unconscious in a pool of blood, with the appellant allegedly confessing to hitting the deceased with an iron pipe. The Trial Court convicted the appellant and sentenced him to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100, relying on the last seen theory, the extra-judicial confession, and medical evidence. The appellant, through his Amicus Curiae, argued that the last seen theory was wrongly applied, the conduct of the key witnesses was unnatural and suspicious, and the conviction was not supported by reliable evidence. The High Court's judgment, as reproduced, sets out the prosecution case and Trial Court findings but the final appellate decision is not fully captured in the provided text.