The petitioners — the husband (an advocate), his brother (a government servant), and his mother — sought quashing of FIR No. 32/2026, charge-sheet No. 57/2026, and cognizance order dated 03.06.2026 before the Chhattisgarh High Court. The FIR was lodged by the wife/respondent No. 2 alleging cruelty, dowry demand, and unnatural sexual intercourse during the brief 10–15 days she resided in the matrimonial home after their March 2022 marriage. The petitioners argued that the allegations were vague, omnibus, unsupported by medical evidence, and filed as an afterthought nearly three years after the wife left the matrimonial home, amounting to abuse of process. The State opposed quashing, contending that prima facie material existed and disputed facts could only be resolved at trial. The court proceeded to examine the scope of its inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, referencing the Bhajan Lal principles, but the judgment text as provided does not record a final operative order.