The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a criminal revision before the Calcutta High Court challenging an order dated 19.02.2019 by the Special CBI Court No. 2, Alipore, which discharged accused Anju Barman from the charge of cheating under Section 420 IPC on the ground that she had repaid the allegedly cheated loan amount through a one-time settlement with UCO Bank, though charges under Sections 120B/467/468/471 IPC were retained against her. The CBI argued that a private one-time settlement with the bank cannot absolve criminal liability for cheating, especially since the accused allegedly floated a non-existent firm (M/S S.P. Industries) and submitted false financial documents to fraudulently obtain a cash credit limit of Rs. 20 lakhs. The opposite party contended that the loan was obtained with proper security (land and fixed deposits), was repaid in full per the settlement, a 'no dues certificate' was issued, and there was no criminal intention to cheat the bank. The trial court had noted as a mitigating factor that the accused had mortgaged property and fixed deposits of equivalent value before obtaining the loan. The High Court considered whether the trial court was justified in discharging the accused under Section 420 IPC, with the judgment text ending before the final ruling is stated.