The petitioner, Dande Chandra Sekhar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati seeking regularisation of his services as a casual labourer at Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), Bapatla, where he had been working since 13 November 1989 — a period of over 27 to 35 years. He contended that the nature of his work was perennial and indispensable to the university's functioning, that continued engagement on a temporary basis constituted an unfair labour practice under Schedule V of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and that non-regularisation violated Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution. The respondents opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioner had not availed alternative remedies before the Industrial Tribunal, that G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 governed eligibility for regularisation, and that the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi (2006) 4 SCC 1 was not applicable. The court considered precedents including the Supreme Court's ruling in Jaggo v. Union of India (2024 SCC Online SC 3826) and coordinate bench decisions of the High Court directing regularisation from the date of completion of 10 years of service. The judgment text as provided ends before the final order is recorded.