The petitioner-wife, residing at Rajamahendravaram, filed a petition under Section 24 CPC before the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati seeking transfer of a divorce petition (F.C.O.P. No. 64 of 2026) filed by her husband at the Family Court, Vizianagaram, to the Family Court at Rajamahendravaram. She contended that the distance of approximately 250 km between the two cities caused her hardship, and that three related cases — a restitution of conjugal rights petition, a maintenance case, and a criminal complaint under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act — were already pending at Rajamahendravaram. The respondent-husband, despite being served notice, did not appear before the Court. The High Court, relying on Supreme Court precedents holding that cases involving common questions of fact and law should be tried by the same court, and noting the convenience of the wife and the existence of multiple related proceedings at Rajamahendravaram, allowed the transfer petition.